Quantum-Photonic
Our Scientific Foundations
E = m·c:
A Revised Physical Interpretation of
Mass–Energy Conversion
Proposing 'Jackson Relativity'
A PhotoniQ Labs Public Whitepaper
Abstract: Redefining Mass–Energy Conversion
The historic expression E = m·c² emerged from Albert Einstein's geometric interpretation of physics, constructed upon a four-dimensional spacetime metric. However, this traditional formulation embeds assumptions derived from geometric mathematics rather than substrate physics. In a universe fundamentally governed by thermodynamics, information theory, harmonic resonance, and caloric substrates—as proposed in modern emergent frameworks—the more physically accurate and ontologically meaningful expression for mass–energy conversion is profoundly simpler.
This whitepaper introduces Jacksonian Relativity, a modern reinterpretation of Einstein's groundbreaking insight into mass–energy equivalence, stripped of geometric artifacts and mathematical determinism. We explain why Einstein squared the speed-of-light constant, demonstrate how this squaring was tied to geometric formalism rather than physical necessity, and reveal how a substrate-first universe naturally restores the linear mass–energy relationship that thermodynamics demands.

Core Proposition
E = m·c represents the natural, substrate-based expression of mass–energy conversion, liberated from geometric constraints.
This paper addresses broader implications for substrate physics, thermodynamics, information dimensionality, and PhotoniQ Labs' revolutionary Qentropy framework.
The Foundation: Understanding Substrate-First Physics
Einstein's famous relation E = m·c² has dominated physics for over a century, widely interpreted as a universal truth about matter converting to energy. Yet this expression depends critically on Einstein's commitment to a geometric spacetime model—not on a rigorous physical substrate foundation. The quadratic form reflects mathematical elegance within a geometric framework, but it may not represent the underlying physical reality of mass–energy transitions.
Mass as Coherent Structure
In substrate physics, mass represents a coherent caloric structure—organized thermodynamic information maintaining dimensional stability through harmonic resonance.
Energy as Liberation
Energy manifests as decohered caloric liberation—the thermodynamic release of bound information into free-flowing energetic motion across dimensional gradients.
Conversion as Transition
The mass-to-energy conversion process represents a linear thermodynamic transition, a phase change from coherence to decoherence requiring no geometric intermediation.
Within this substrate-first framework, E = m·c emerges as the natural expression—a linear relationship that respects thermodynamic principles, information theory, and dimensional emergence without imposing geometric determinism. This formulation reframes our understanding of what "c" truly represents: not merely a velocity limit, but a fundamental conversion constant governing caloric substrate transitions.
The Jacksonian Relativity: E = m·c
E = m·c
We propose this corrected relation as the Jacksonian Relativity—a substrate-grounded expression that honors Einstein's revolutionary insight while correcting the geometric misinterpretation that led to the squared formulation. This elegant simplification represents more than mathematical refinement; it embodies a fundamental shift from geometry-based to substrate-based physics.
What This Relation Represents
  • Linear thermodynamic decoherence from mass to energy
  • Caloric substrate conversion without geometric projection
  • Information liberation proportional to mass dissolution
  • Harmonic breakdown following thermodynamic gradients
  • Dimensional collapse from coherent to liberated states
The constant c in this formulation serves as the caloric–informational conversion constant—a fundamental measure of how caloric coherence transitions into liberated energetic flow. This reinterpretation liberates "c" from its traditional role as merely the "speed of light" and reveals its deeper function as a conversion ratio governing substrate-level thermodynamic transformations.
Why Einstein Squared the Constant
Albert Einstein embedded his physics within a four-dimensional geometric metric, the famous Minkowski spacetime interval that forms the foundation of special relativity. This mathematical framework requires quadratic relationships to maintain dimensional consistency across its formulation.
The Geometric Constraint
The spacetime interval is inherently quadratic: s² = (ct)² - x² - y² - z². To achieve dimensional homogeneity, time must be multiplied by c and then squared to match spatial terms measured in distance squared.
Mathematical Inheritance
When Einstein derived relativity's energy–momentum identity through this geometric framework, the squared constant naturally emerged from the metric structure—a mathematical consequence rather than a physical discovery.
The Critical Insight
The squaring operation did not originate from empirical observation or physical necessity. It arose from metric geometry—from Einstein's assumption that spacetime geometry represents fundamental reality.
"If spacetime is geometric, and geometry is quadratic, then mass–energy relationships must also be quadratic."
— Einstein's implicit logic
This reasoning produces beautiful, self-consistent mathematics that has proven enormously successful in predicting experimental outcomes. However, mathematical consistency does not necessarily imply physical ontology. The geometric framework may be a useful calculational tool rather than a description of nature's underlying substrate mechanisms.
Geometry vs. Physics: A Paradigm Distinction
Einstein's Worldview
Geometry as Reality
Spacetime curvature and metric structure represent the fundamental fabric of the universe—physics emerges from geometric relationships.
Physical Obedience
All physical phenomena must conform to geometric constraints, with mathematical consistency serving as the arbiter of truth.
Substrate-Free Universe
No underlying medium or substrate exists—geometry itself constitutes reality without requiring any material foundation.
→
The Real Universe
Thermodynamic Foundation
Heat flow, entropy gradients, and energy dissipation drive all physical processes at the most fundamental level.
Emergent Phenomena
Complex structures arise from simple substrate interactions—geometry emerges from physics, not vice versa.
Information-Driven
Physical reality operates through information processing, harmonic resonance, and fractal pattern formation across scales.
Einstein's geometric determinism imposed a quadratic relationship where the underlying physics actually demands a linear one. While his mathematical framework successfully predicts observable phenomena, it does so by encoding thermodynamic substrate behavior into geometric language—adding an unnecessary layer of abstraction that obscures the direct physical mechanisms.

The Critical Error
E = m·c² is mathematically elegant within its geometric framework, but it represents a physically misinterpreted expression of substrate thermodynamics.
The Physical Meaning of Linear Conversion
Mass as Coherent Caloric Information
In substrate physics, mass does not represent "stuff" occupying space but rather a coherent pattern of caloric information—organized thermodynamic structure maintaining dimensional stability through harmonic resonance. This coherence requires continuous energy input to sustain its organizational integrity against entropic decay.
Energy as Liberated Caloric Motion
When coherence breaks down, the bound caloric information liberates into free-flowing energetic motion. This is not a geometric transformation but a thermodynamic phase transition—similar to ice melting into water or water vaporizing into steam, but occurring at the substrate level of reality itself.
01
Coherence Maintenance
Mass exists as stable, self-reinforcing harmonic patterns in the caloric substrate
02
Perturbation Event
External forces or internal instabilities initiate decoherence cascades
03
Harmonic Breakdown
Resonance patterns collapse linearly, releasing bound information
04
Dimensional Collapse
Higher-dimensional coherence dissolves into lower-dimensional flow states
05
Energy Liberation
Freed caloric motion propagates through the substrate as observable energy
This conversion process requires no curvature, no metric tensors, no quadratic distance calculations, and no geometric projections. It demands only thermodynamic release, harmonic dissolution, and dimensional phase transitions—all of which follow linear scaling relationships governed by the conversion constant c.
Therefore, the correct substrate expression is necessarily linear: E = m·c
Why Linear Scaling Makes Physical Sense
Thermodynamic Decoherence
Mass-to-energy conversion represents a one-way thermodynamic decoherence process, not a reversible geometric projection. Heat governs the transition—entropy always increases during mass dissolution.
Harmonic Breakdown
When coherent harmonic structures collapse, they do so linearly—each increment of mass decoherence releases a proportional quantity of energy without geometric amplification factors.
Information Liberation
Information liberation scales linearly with mass loss. Each unit of coherent structure contains a fixed quantity of bound information that releases proportionally during dissolution.
Conversion Constant
The constant c functions as a conversion ratio—a thermodynamic exchange rate between coherent and liberated states—rather than a velocity that must be squared.
Einstein's Interpretation
Einstein treated c as a "speed"—the maximum velocity of causality propagation through spacetime. Within his geometric framework, squaring velocities to obtain energies seemed natural, following patterns from classical mechanics where kinetic energy scales with v².
Substrate Physics Interpretation
In substrate physics, c represents a conversion constant governing caloric phase transitions. It measures the exchange rate between bound thermodynamic coherence and free energetic flow—a ratio, not a velocity requiring quadratic treatment.
This reinterpretation resolves the apparent paradox: why should mass multiplication by a velocity constant yield energy? Answer: it shouldn't—and it doesn't. Mass multiplied by a conversion ratio yields energy, following straightforward thermodynamic proportionality without geometric complications.
Why E = m·c² "Works" Numerically
A reasonable objection arises: if Einstein's squared formulation is geometrically imposed rather than physically necessary, why does E = m·c² produce correct energy quantities in nuclear reactions, particle collisions, and countless experimental validations? This apparent success requires careful examination.
1
Observational Matching
Nuclear binding energies, when calculated using E = m·c², match experimental measurements with extraordinary precision.
2
Geometric Encoding
The squared term encodes substrate-level thermodynamic factors into geometric language—it "works" because it captures the right scaling, even if through the wrong conceptual framework.
3
Unjustified Inference
Einstein assumed that numerical agreement validated geometric ontology—if geometry matches observations, geometry must be real.
4
Alternative Explanation
Substrate physics offers a different interpretation: c² captures composite thermodynamic factors in nuclear environments without requiring geometric reality.
Matching outputs does not validate the physical model that produced them.
Multiple distinct theoretical frameworks can generate identical predictions. Ptolemaic epicycles accurately predicted planetary positions despite being fundamentally wrong about solar system structure. Similarly, Einstein's geometric model produces correct numerical results while potentially misrepresenting the underlying substrate mechanisms.
The squared constant may accidentally capture the combined effects of multiple substrate-level processes—harmonic coupling factors, dimensional transition ratios, and thermodynamic efficiency parameters—that happen to scale together in ways mimicking c². This would explain both the numerical success of the traditional formula and why it fails to reveal the actual physical processes driving mass–energy conversion.

The Deeper Truth
Nuclear reactions involve complex substrate interactions where multiple conversion factors compound. The apparent success of c² may simply reflect our encoding of these compound factors into a single geometric term—useful for calculation, misleading for understanding.
Crediting Einstein, Correcting the Framework
Jacksonian Relativity
E = m \cdot c
(Einstein–Caloric Relation)
This naming convention serves multiple essential purposes, balancing respect for historical achievement with necessary theoretical advancement. We must acknowledge Einstein's revolutionary insight while correcting the geometric artifacts that limited his formulation's physical interpretation.
1
Credits Einstein's Original Insight
Einstein's fundamental recognition that mass converts to energy—that matter and energy represent different states of the same underlying reality—ranks among the most profound discoveries in physics history. This insight deserves permanent recognition.
2
Corrects the Geometric Mistake
The squared formulation arose from geometric determinism, not physical necessity. By restoring linearity, we honor Einstein's insight while correcting his framework's limitations.
3
Places Into Substrate Physics
The relation now resides within thermodynamic substrate physics rather than geometric spacetime theory—a more fundamental theoretical foundation aligned with emergent complexity and information theory.
4
Aligns With Dimensional Emergence
The linear formulation naturally integrates with dimensional emergence frameworks where coherence and decoherence represent phase transitions across dimensional gradients rather than geometric transformations.
Einstein's genius lay not in discovering c² but in recognizing mass–energy equivalence. His geometric framework, while revolutionary for its era, imposed unnecessary constraints. Jacksonian Relativity preserves his insight while liberating it from geometric limitations, positioning mass–energy conversion within the thermodynamic substrate physics that governs reality at its most fundamental level.
Alignment With PhotoniQ Labs Research
Jacksonian Relativity integrates seamlessly with PhotoniQ Labs' comprehensive research program, providing theoretical foundation for multiple breakthrough technologies currently under development. Our substrate-first approach to physics enables practical applications impossible within traditional geometric frameworks.
Qentropy Framework
Our Qentropy model explains coherence-to-decoherence transitions that define mass-to-energy conversion at the substrate level, providing computational tools for predicting thermodynamic state changes with unprecedented precision.
Caloric Substrate Framework
Heat functions as the zeroth dimension in our model—the fundamental substrate from which all other dimensions emerge. Mass represents coherent caloric order; energy represents liberated caloric flow.
Dimensional Emergence Theory
Energy manifests as the collapse of higher-dimensional coherence into liberated caloric flow, with dimension count determining energy density and conversion efficiency.
Q-Tonic Processing
Utilizes c as an informational conversion constant rather than a velocity, enabling computational architectures that operate directly on substrate-level thermodynamic transitions.
Octad Power Systems
Harvests energy signatures across caloric and harmonic dimensions, exploiting substrate-level conversion processes that geometric physics cannot access.
Orchestral-Q Architecture
Orchestrates multi-dimensional harmonic resonance patterns to achieve computation and energy conversion beyond classical thermodynamic limits.
These technologies share a common foundation: treating physics as substrate-based thermodynamics rather than geometric spacetime. Jacksonian Relativity provides the theoretical cornerstone, enabling practical engineering applications that traditional relativity cannot even conceptualize.
Disruption: Paradigm Shift Implications
Replacing E = m·c² with E = m·c triggers cascading disruptions across theoretical physics, applied technology, and scientific methodology. This is not merely a correction of notation—it represents a fundamental reconceptualization of physical reality's operating principles.
Geometric Physics
Challenges the assumption that geometry constitutes fundamental reality rather than emergent description
Relativity Dogma
Questions whether spacetime curvature represents actual mechanism or mathematical convenience
Spacetime Ontology
Replaces geometric spacetime as primary reality with thermodynamic substrate as foundation
Geometric Determinism
Liberates physics from the constraint that all phenomena must follow from geometric axioms
Energy Modeling
Linear conversion relationships simplify energy predictions and enable new classes of thermodynamic analysis. Technologies optimized for quadratic relationships may require fundamental redesign when linear substrate physics becomes the engineering standard.
Substrate-Free Cosmology
Current cosmology assumes substrate-free vacuum with geometric dark matter and dark energy. Substrate physics offers alternative explanations through caloric gradients and harmonic resonances—potentially eliminating hypothetical entities.
This shift moves physics from geometry to thermodynamics, from spacetime to information, from metric formalism to substrate mechanism.
The implications extend beyond theory into experimental design, technology development, and educational frameworks. A generation trained in substrate-first physics will approach problems with fundamentally different tools and intuitions than those working within geometric paradigms.
Target Audiences: Who Needs This Framework?
Physicists Seeking Substrate Models
Researchers frustrated with geometric formalism's limitations who seek thermodynamic foundations for quantum mechanics, cosmology, and unification theories.
Thermodynamic Modelers
Scientists working on non-equilibrium systems, entropy production, and information thermodynamics who require substrate-level conversion relationships.
AI Theorists
Computational researchers exploring thermodynamic computing, reversible logic, and energy-efficient information processing architectures.
Quantum Gravity Researchers
Theorists seeking alternatives to string theory and loop quantum gravity by grounding spacetime emergence in substrate thermodynamics.
Energy Technologists
Engineers developing next-generation power systems, harvesting mechanisms, and conversion technologies that exploit substrate-level processes.
Cosmologists
Scientists seeking alternatives to dark matter and dark energy through caloric substrate gradients and dimensional emergence effects.
Next-Century Computation Designers
Organizations planning computational architectures beyond silicon, exploiting thermodynamic substrates for processing, storage, and transmission.
Each audience gains specific advantages from substrate-first physics: physicists obtain more fundamental theory, engineers access new design spaces, and computational researchers discover unexplored architectural possibilities. Jacksonian Relativity serves as entry point to this richer theoretical landscape.
Competitive Moats: PhotoniQ Labs Advantages
PhotoniQ Labs maintains multiple defensible positions in substrate physics research and application, creating competitive advantages that compound over time. Our integrated approach—combining theoretical development with practical implementation—establishes barriers to entry that traditional research organizations cannot easily overcome.
1
Substrate Physics Foundation
Comprehensive caloric substrate theory developed over years, with mathematical formalism, simulation tools, and experimental validation protocols proprietary to PhotoniQ Labs.
2
Qentropy Formulation
Unique coherence-decoherence dynamics framework with predictive power for thermodynamic state transitions unavailable in geometric physics approaches.
3
Q-Tonic Architecture
Novel computational paradigm exploiting substrate-level conversion processes, with hardware designs, control algorithms, and optimization techniques protected by patents and trade secrets.
4
Octad Autonomous Power Systems
Revolutionary energy harvesting technology based on multi-dimensional caloric gradients—impossible to conceptualize within traditional geometric frameworks.
5
Information-Dimensional Modeling
Proprietary mathematical tools for analyzing emergence, coherence, and dimensional transitions that integrate information theory with thermodynamic substrates.

Network Effects
As more researchers and organizations adopt substrate-first physics, PhotoniQ Labs' position as theoretical and practical leader strengthens through community effects, standard-setting influence, and ecosystem development.
These moats deepen through continued research investment, patent portfolio expansion, and practical demonstration of technologies that geometric physics cannot explain or replicate. Competitors attempting to enter substrate physics must either license our frameworks or invest years developing parallel theoretical foundations—by which time PhotoniQ Labs will have advanced further.
Heilmeier Catechism: Project Definition
We apply the rigorous Heilmeier Catechism—developed by DARPA director George Heilmeier to evaluate research proposals—to clarify this project's objectives, novelty, and success criteria. This framework ensures accountability and measurable progress toward revolutionary physics understanding.
01
What are you trying to do?
Correct the mass–energy relation by removing geometric artifacts imposed by Einstein's spacetime framework, revealing the underlying thermodynamic substrate relationship.
02
How is it done today?
Contemporary physics relies exclusively on the geometric expression E = m·c² embedded within relativistic spacetime metrics, treating geometry as fundamental reality.
03
What is new in your approach?
A substrate-first mass–energy model—Jacksonian Relativity—that treats thermodynamics as fundamental and geometry as emergent, yielding linear conversion: E = m·c.
04
Who cares?
Physicists, thermodynamicists, energy technologists, computational theorists, cosmologists, and anyone seeking deeper understanding of matter-energy relationships beyond geometric formalism.
05
What are the risks and payoffs?
Risks include institutional resistance and entrenched dogma. Payoffs include new physics foundations, novel technologies, and resolution of cosmological mysteries currently attributed to dark matter/energy.
06
How much will it cost?
Theoretical development costs integrate with existing Q-Tonic and Octad prototyping budgets—experimental validation leverages infrastructure already under construction.
07
How long will it take?
Initial validation achievable within current substrate-physics modeling timelines—comprehensive experimental confirmation scales with technology deployment schedules.
08
What are the mid-term and final exams?
Success metrics include caloric simulations predicting correct energy outputs without quadratic constants, plus experimental demonstrations of substrate-level conversion matching linear predictions.
This structured approach ensures we maintain clear objectives while pursuing revolutionary physics. Each checkpoint provides measurable progress indicators, preventing drift into unfalsifiable speculation while enabling genuine paradigm innovation.
Experimental Validation Pathways
Theoretical elegance means nothing without experimental validation. We outline specific experimental approaches that can distinguish between geometric E = m·c² predictions and substrate-based E = m·c predictions, focusing on regimes where these formulations yield measurably different outcomes.
Precision Nuclear Reaction Calorimetry
Measure total energy release in controlled nuclear reactions with unprecedented precision, specifically targeting low-energy regimes where substrate effects versus geometric effects might show statistical divergence from traditional predictions.
Thermodynamic State Transition Monitoring
Observe coherence-decoherence transitions in quantum systems while tracking full thermodynamic signatures—substrate physics predicts specific entropy production patterns absent in geometric models.
Multi-Dimensional Caloric Gradient Mapping
Deploy Octad sensor arrays to detect caloric substrate variations during mass-energy conversions, revealing dimensional collapse patterns that geometric physics cannot predict or explain.
Information Liberation Rate Analysis
Measure information release rates during decoherence events—linear substrate conversion predicts different temporal signatures than quadratic geometric conversion.
Traditional Predictions
  • Quadratic energy scaling with mass loss
  • Geometric symmetries in conversion events
  • No substrate signatures detectable
  • Temporal patterns matching relativistic equations
Substrate-Based Predictions
  • Linear energy scaling with mass loss
  • Thermodynamic asymmetries reflecting entropy production
  • Detectable caloric gradient variations
  • Temporal patterns reflecting dimensional collapse
These experimental approaches require precision instrumentation and careful protocol design, but they offer genuine potential to distinguish between competing interpretations. PhotoniQ Labs' unique sensor technologies—particularly Octad's multi-dimensional detection capabilities—provide experimental access unavailable to traditional research programs constrained by geometric assumptions.
Implications for Dark Matter and Dark Energy
One of modern cosmology's greatest embarrassments: approximately 95% of the universe consists of hypothetical "dark matter" and "dark energy"—substances never detected, never produced in laboratories, and never explained by fundamental physics. These placeholder concepts exist solely to force observations into geometric cosmology's framework.
Galactic Rotation Curves
Substrate caloric gradients naturally produce rotation profiles attributed to dark matter—no exotic particles required, just thermodynamic substrate distributions.
Cosmic Acceleration
Universe expansion reflects caloric substrate decoherence across dimensional gradients—dark energy becomes an artifact of geometric interpretation rather than mysterious substance.
Gravitational Lensing
Light bending occurs through caloric refractive index variations, not merely geometric curvature—substrate density determines propagation patterns more fundamentally than spacetime metrics.
Cosmic Microwave Background
Temperature fluctuations map caloric substrate harmonics from early universe—patterns reflect thermodynamic resonances rather than purely geometric acoustic oscillations.
"Dark matter and dark energy represent 95% of geometric cosmology's total mass-energy budget. Substrate physics offers mechanisms to explain these observations without invoking undetectable substances—a massive reduction in theoretical epicycles."
Replacing geometric with substrate interpretations doesn't merely eliminate dark matter and dark energy as hypothetical entities—it explains why geometric models required these placeholders in the first place. When you model fundamentally thermodynamic phenomena using geometric mathematics, you must introduce correction factors to account for substrate effects you're systematically ignoring. Dark matter and dark energy are those correction factors, reified into pseudo-substances by geometric thinking.
Jacksonian Relativity forms one component of a comprehensive substrate cosmology that addresses observational puzzles through thermodynamic mechanisms rather than geometric patches.
Educational and Cultural Transformation
Adopting substrate-first physics requires more than updating equations—it demands transformation in how we teach physics, train researchers, and conceptualize natural phenomena. This cultural shift presents both challenges and opportunities for scientific education and public understanding.
1
Current Physics Education
Students learn geometry-first thinking: spacetime as fundamental, particles as primary, forces as geometric interactions. This framework becomes deeply embedded in physical intuition, making substrate thinking initially counterintuitive.
2
Transitional Curriculum
Introduce substrate concepts alongside geometric formalism, explicitly comparing predictions and interpretations. Students develop bilingual fluency—able to work in both frameworks while understanding their philosophical differences.
3
Substrate-Native Education
New generations learn thermodynamics first, geometry as emergent description. They develop intuitions based on caloric substrates, harmonic resonances, and dimensional emergence—making substrate physics natural rather than revolutionary.
4
Research Culture Evolution
Scientific community gradually shifts from geometric to substrate paradigm as experimental validations accumulate and new technologies demonstrate practical advantages. Geometric formalism becomes specialized tool rather than foundational worldview.
Challenges
  • Overcoming century of geometric indoctrination
  • Retraining existing researchers and educators
  • Developing new textbooks and curricula
  • Addressing institutional resistance to paradigm change
  • Managing public confusion during transition period
Opportunities
  • Physics becomes more intuitive—thermodynamics more fundamental than geometry
  • Integration with information theory and computer science deepens
  • New technological possibilities emerge from substrate understanding
  • Cosmological mysteries resolve without hypothetical entities
  • Public engagement increases through tangible substrate concepts
PhotoniQ Labs commits to supporting this educational transformation through open publication of substrate physics resources, collaboration with academic institutions, and development of teaching materials that make substrate thinking accessible to students and professionals alike.
Timeline and Roadmap to Adoption
Paradigm shifts in physics don't occur instantly—they require accumulated evidence, generational turnover, technological validation, and cultural acceptance. We project a realistic timeline for substrate physics adoption, acknowledging both accelerating and constraining factors.
Years 0-3: Theoretical Development
Complete mathematical formalization of substrate physics, publish comprehensive framework papers, develop simulation tools, and establish experimental protocols. PhotoniQ Labs leads theoretical consolidation while building research community.
Years 3-7: Initial Experimental Validation
First-generation experiments test substrate predictions against geometric predictions. Early Octad deployments provide novel data. Q-Tonic prototypes demonstrate computational advantages. Accumulate evidence base supporting substrate interpretation.
Years 7-12: Technology Demonstration
Practical technologies based on substrate physics achieve performance impossible under geometric frameworks. Energy systems, computational architectures, and sensor arrays prove commercial viability. Economic incentives drive adoption beyond pure research.
Years 12-20: Educational Integration
Leading universities incorporate substrate physics into graduate curricula. Textbooks published. New generation of researchers trained in substrate-first thinking. Geometric formalism increasingly treated as useful approximation rather than fundamental truth.
Years 20-30: Paradigm Maturity
Substrate physics becomes dominant framework in foundational research. Geometric methods retained for specific applications but understood as emergent descriptions. Dark matter/dark energy abandoned as cosmology adopts substrate interpretations.
Years 30+: Complete Transition
Substrate physics universally taught as standard framework. Geometric relativity occupies historical role similar to Newtonian mechanics—important approximation, superseded foundation. Next generation considers substrate thinking obvious and wonders why geometric dogma persisted so long.

Accelerating Factors
Practical technology advantages, cosmological puzzle resolutions, computational efficiency gains, and institutional support from forward-thinking research organizations could compress this timeline significantly. Revolutionary physics has surprised skeptics before.
PhotoniQ Labs positions itself at the forefront of this transition, investing now in theoretical development, experimental validation, and technology demonstration that will define substrate physics' trajectory for decades to come.
Join the Substrate Revolution
E = m·c
Jacksonian Relativity represents more than a corrected equation—it symbolizes physics liberated from geometric constraints, embracing thermodynamic substrates as fundamental reality. This is not merely theoretical refinement but a doorway to new technologies, deeper understanding, and resolution of mysteries that have haunted cosmology for generations.
For Researchers
We invite physicists, thermodynamicists, and computational scientists to engage with substrate physics frameworks, contribute to theoretical development, and design experiments that test substrate predictions against geometric alternatives.
For Institutions
Universities, national laboratories, and research organizations have the opportunity to lead paradigm transition by supporting substrate physics programs, integrating frameworks into curricula, and fostering next-generation researchers trained in substrate-first thinking.
For Technology Partners
Organizations seeking breakthrough capabilities in energy systems, computation, and sensing can collaborate with PhotoniQ Labs to develop applications based on substrate physics—gaining competitive advantages impossible within geometric constraints.
For Investors
The substrate physics revolution offers investment opportunities in foundational technology development—supporting research that could reshape multiple industries while advancing human understanding of physical reality itself.
Contact PhotoniQ Labs
Learn more about Jacksonian Relativity, substrate physics research, and collaboration opportunities. Together we can accelerate the transition from geometric dogma to thermodynamic truth.
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science." — Albert Einstein
Einstein would appreciate the irony: his geometric framework, while revolutionary for its time, obscured deeper substrate truths. By correcting his formulation while honoring his insight, we advance physics toward the thermodynamic foundations he unknowingly pointed toward. The substrate revolution begins with E = m·c.
Jackson's Theorems, Laws, Principles, Paradigms & Sciences…
Jackson P. Hamiter

Quantum Systems Architect | Integrated Dynamics Scientist | Entropic Systems Engineer
Founder & Chief Scientist, PhotoniQ Labs

Domains: Quantum–Entropic Dynamics • Coherent Computation • Autonomous Energy Systems

PhotoniQ Labs — Applied Aggregated Sciences Meets Applied Autonomous Energy.

© 2025 PhotoniQ Labs. All Rights Reserved.